Saturday, 8 January 2011

08-Jan-2011 - I TOTALLY SUPPORT Richard's Comment re EUroScepticism BUT!

08-Jan-2011 - I TOTALLY SUPPORT Richard's Comment re EUroScepticism BUT!

A cracked record - by Richard... Saturday, January 08, 2011


I feel a bit like Robin Horbury here, who writes a fine piece on Biased BBC himself complaining about feeling like a "cracked record". You can only keep on saying the same things over and over again for so long before even you get tired of your own voice.

Another thing I also get a little bit tired of is being branded the "bad sod", the one who is always out on his own, who can't join in and put his weight behind the common cause.

That much has been put to me about the Referendum Campaign and also the anti-EU campaign in the Daily Express, which has culminated in the publication today of a 23-page booklet, telling us that we must, "Get Britain out of the EU".

It is not, of course, that we do not agree with the sentiment, but the front cover tells you everything you need to know about the eurosceptic thinking in this country. Redolent of the famous 1940 Low cartoon (inset below), it has the trademark Express crusader standing on the cliffs of Dover, looking out toward the Continent – where (by inference) the "enemy" exist.

And here the "cracked record" comes in. The EU is not a foreign construct imposed on us. Our government is an enthusiastic part of the EU nexus and the only reason we are in the EU is because Parliament permits it. It is not looking over the Channel to the Continent that our brave crusader needs to be doing. He needs to be looking inwards, tearing down the gates of Westminster. The enemy is within.

That said, if there was any doubt that the Express had lodged itself in the last century, we just need to read the offering from editor Peter Hill, where the tone – and content – would be familiar to anyone who had attended UKIP meetings ... of the '90s.

All the buzz-words are there, "sovereignty", the mandatory reference to "Napoleon" and "Hitler", the "wine and milk lakes" and the "butter and grain mountains", not forgetting, of course, the swipe at the "superstate".

I have written too many pieces on this blog about the fate of euroscepticism to want to repeat them, but in the forty years, on an off, that I've been fighting the EU, I would like to think I've learnt a thing or two about the enemy, and how to fight it.

Mr Peter Hill of the Express, however, doesn't appear to have learnt a thing, and the eurosceptic movement is a moribund as ever if that is the best it has to offer. In that sense, the movement itself is the cracked record, endless repeating the same tired, jaded message, while the world carries out without it.

We have to be capable of doing better than that and, until we can, I want no part of it.
To view Dr. Richard North's Original Article CLICK HERE

You will note the title of this article is:
08-Jan-2011 - I TOTALLY SUPPORT Richard's Comment re EUroScepticism BUT!

NOW for the 'BUT' - yes I do agree with Richard however I find myself in the position where age and health are taking their toll on my time/energy to fight the good fight, not for myself as I have enjoyed my life and made much of it BUT because I feel I should do all I can to give the future a chance - something I increasingly KNOW it does not have, unless those of the future value increased overpopulation mostly due to over copulation!

In my lifetime ie since 1945 the human population of this planet has risen, so far, from just a tad under 2 Billion people to just short of 7 Billion - of course this has led on its margins to the stripping of forests to build and to create more agricultural space and living room.

First things first - perhaps someone can explain why in Communist China 28% of economic activity is that of The State yet in Britain we now have 53% of economic activity and employment State controlled yet we have absolutely no say over our destiny and are denied the fundamental human right of Self Determination.

When will we be accorded that fundamental human right, when will Democracy be re-patriated, when will we have the right to vote to determine our own future.

When will we have our IN or OUT Referendum on membership of the malign, malevolent and staggeringly damaging Evils of a centralised undemocratic EUropean Union.

It has always been said that the difference between a terrorist and a freedom fighter when he blows up and kills substantial numbers of an authoritarian political class is that the terrorist has access to a ballot box but a freedom fighter does not and thus his actions are honourable.

Since we are clearly denied the access to the ballot box on the ONE AND ONLY issue that matters when do YOU consider blowing up a gathering of Politicians would be acceptable?

For a self styled and self serving Political class to set rules as to what WE whom they supposedly serve should be allowed to vote on they have clearly lost the plot and it starts to look as if they NEED to be blown up.

I do agree with Richard when he states he can not choose to be associated with the limp wristed misrepresentation of the fact that The EU is NOT our enemy - our enemy are those who betray us at and via Westminster - You will note they cleverly removed the Treason Laws and in 1998 finally removed the death penalty for their criminal behaviour!

Unlike Richard I find I lack the courage to stand nobly by and watch my Country being destroyed and therefore I have chosen to conjoin with what can only be described as the lesser of the evils and use the weak and wishy washy to point out the undeniably corrupt and dishonest. Perhaps I can help put lead in the pencil of the pusillanimous! I can but try in what time energy is granted to me ;-)

When is our Referendum and the RIGHT to self Determination and failing that when shall we start hanging Politicians from lamp posts. Obscene as the action was let us for a moment think of Gabrielle Giffords fighting for survival after finding herself the victim of some crazed youngster encouraged it seems by her having been in the 'Cross Hairs' of Sahra Palin's utterly irresponsible self interested advertising campaign where Congress Woman Gabrielle Giffords was featured as a target, overlayed with the Cross Hairs of a rifle sight!

Gabrielle Giffords' crime was not selling out her Country and her peoples to foreign rule and profligate centralised governance of a wholly debased and alien nature but actively voting, with the best of intentions, for Health Care for all!
Enhanced by Zemanta

08-Jan-2011 - The EXPRESS Comes Up Trumps!

Hi,

as promised - here is The EXPRESS 20 page coverage of why Britain MUST Leave The EU - to view all 20 pages on line CLICK HERE

It does not open first time, some of the time - persevere it is worth it!

May I suggest you download the entire .pdf onto your own computer just in case it becomes hard to obtain on line.

ENJOY!

Our Thanks for this Patriotic effort on the part of The Express - I just bought 20 copies and gave them to friends!

How about rewarding The Express for making the effort - just print out the pic below.

You can copy it onto your computer and set up a number of them on an A4 sheet to print out and get all your friends to sign:
Thanks - all the more the merrier.

Don't forget to sign:
The Petition
&
The Pledge

whilst you are on this site - links are easily accessed from the right sidebar.

Regards,
Greg_L-W.

Thursday, 6 January 2011

06 for 08-Jan-2011 HEADS UP for The EXPRESS SUPPLEMENT on Saturday re EU.

06 for 08-Jan-2011 HEADS UP for The EXPRESS SUPPLEMENT on Saturday re EU.

Hi,

Just a Heads-up not to miss The Express Newspaper on Saturday 08-Jan-2011.

We hear the express will be doing a multi page supplement.

Members of The Midnight Group have been able to assist The Express in producing the supplement on The EU and why The UK should pull out of The EU and there will be an article by The EU Referendum Campaign Group's lead spokesman Jon Gaunt.

We understand that Nikki Sinclaire has been working closely with another Sunday paper to raise the profile of The Petition for an IN/OUT Referendum and it is also expected that The Petition will be laid before Parliament by Nikki Sinclaire working with a prominent Labour MP placing The Petition in The HoC Library and on The Speaker's Chair as is the correct procedure.

It is hoped this will lead to an EDM relative to the first 20,000 signatures - It is then planned that a Tory MP of note will do likewise with the next 20,000 (The petition is just short of the 40,000 signatures needed for the second batch, at the moment)

It looks as if we have a busy year ahead of us at The Midnight Group and wish all our supporters well.

Regards to all and have a great 2011.

DON'T FORGET YOUR EXPRESS COPIES on Saturday.

Regards,
Greg_L-W.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, 26 December 2010

26-Dec-2010 - EXPRESS - WHY WE WANT A REFERENDUM FOR CHRISTMAS ;-)

26-Dec-2010 - EXPRESS - WHY WE WANT A REFERENDUM FOR CHRISTMAS ;-)

EU LEAVES HEAT AND POWER ON AT PARLIAMENT

Story Image
EU bosses spend a fortune on illuminating and heating rooms which are unused for weeks on end
Sunday December 26,2010

 

By James Fielding

EU BOSSES are wasting thousands of pounds of British taxpayers’ money by keeping hundreds of lights burning all night in empty offices at the Strasbourg Parliament.
A fortune is spent every year illuminating and heating rooms which are unused for weeks on end.
The flagrant waste also makes a mockery of the EU’s attempts to reduce its carbon footprint and deliver a “low-energy economy”.
MEPs gather at the £400million building, on France’s border with Germany, for just four days every month.
UKIP MEP Mike Nattrass, who took this picture, last night branded the waste “disgraceful”. He photographed lights blazing away in the Parliament’s main Louise Weiss building and in the adjoining Winston Churchill block.
Light switches and radiators were left on in empty offices, hallways and even the canteen on Thursday evening, long after Eurocrats had packed up and left.
Mr Nattrass, MEP for the West Midlands, added: “This is just another example of the EU gravy train. This has gone on for too long, I am sick and tired of walking past the Strasbourg Parliament and seeing all the office lights left on when nobody is in them.
“On Thursday, voting finished just after midday and MEPs all started to drift off as usual. Hours later I took photographs of light beaming out of the Louise Weiss building and it wasn’t from one room but lots of them.
“I then went into the building the following day on Friday and checked to see if the heating was on and it was. The place was virtually deserted.
“Hardworking Britons will be sick to their stomachs to know their cash is being wasted in this manner. It’s absolutely disgraceful.”
Mr Nattrass also revealed that the majority of the 2,000 offices inside the Parliament have showers, washbasins and TVs that can pick up channels from all over the world. “It’s needless,” he said. “I’ve never used the shower in my office as long as I’ve been an MEP. Why would I need to? I have one before I leave the hotel in the morning.”

The monthly jaunt from the European Parliament in Brussels Belgium to Strasbourg, 216 miles away, is estimated to cost the public an annual £200million.
Yet MEPs are there for voting sessions on just 48 days a year.
Moving various files and equipment between the two cities takes 30 men and 10 large trucks.
The huge cost involved has led to repeated calls to have Brussels as the sole location of the Parliament.
To read the original article CLICK HERE

Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, 22 December 2010

22-Dec-2010 - NEWS LETTER - EU REFERENDUM

You can click on the links below to add this newsletter to your social media profile.
Bookmark with: What are these?
Facebook Facebook LinkedIn LinkedIn Twitter Twitter



If you haven't signed The EU Referendum Pledge yet click on the link above to go to the sign up page at EUpledge.com



MAKE A DONATION
Don't forget, you can now donate to the campaign for an EU Referendum using a credit or debit card via PayPal as well as cheque or bank transfer.
Click for details


Even at Christmas, the EU Referendum Campaign continues!

Our campaign to add 5,000 signatures in a week was a roaring success. Now we want to continue that success over the Christmas break.

Make the most of having your family and friends with you by downloading the brand new Pledge Form and getting them to add their names to the thousands already calling for an EU Referendum.

You can download the form right here.

And don't forget, you can forward this email on to your friends as well, just tell them to click on the link on the left to add their name to The Pledge.

Politicians are completely out of touch with public opinion. We have commissioned four independent opinion polls over the last three months – and they all show that the overwhelming majority of the British public want a referendum on the EU.
 
What are the politicians afraid of? Can you think of one reason why we can’t have a referendum? The government are spending over £80 million on a referendum on our voting system next year – why can’t we have our referendum on the same day?

Until then, have a great Christmas.

James Pryor, Chief Executive

Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, 17 December 2010

TORY PROMISES - Mr. CAMERON Be A Man & Honour OUR REFERENDUM - YOU PROMISED!

TORY PROMISES - Mr. CAMERON Be A Man & Honour OUR REFERENDUM - YOU PROMISED!

 News story

Join our campaign for an EU referendum

Monday, April 27 2009

Ahead of the European elections on 4th June, David Cameron has launched a campaign to get Gordon Brown to honour his pledge to give the British people a referendum on the EU Treaty.

In their 2005 election manifesto, Labour promised to hold a referendum on the EU Constitution. 

David stressed the Lisbon Treaty was a “re-branded” version of that Constitution and attacked Gordon Brown for having “flip-flopped”:

“First he was against the Constitution, then he was for it; one day he promised a referendum, the next he backtracked. While he has chopped and changed, our position has remained exactly the same. We are the only major party to have consistently said that it is up to the British people to decide on our future in Europe.”

David promised that if the Constitution was not in force at the time of the General Election, a Conservative Government would hold a referendum on it, urge a no vote, and reverse Britain’s ratification if successful.

He explained, “I believe that if you make a promise in your manifesto, and the country votes on that manifesto, then you are honour-bound to keep that promise.”

You can join our campaign by signing up to our Facebook page  or downloading our 'EU-turn' widget .

For the original CLICK HERE

CLEARLY The Tory Party and the gonadically challenged wee  Boy King do not believe in the New Constitution aka Lisbon Treaty even pronouncing it as a sham.

They did virtually nothing in opposition to oppose this treacherous betrayal of the people of Britain and now shelter behind the weasel words of 'if the Constitution was not in force at the time of the General Election' .

In the parliamentary debate David Cameron lacked both the courage and the integrity to speak out and tell the truth - they assisted Gordon Brown in his betrayal of these United Kingdoms and the dishonest surrender to this squalid new CONSTITUTION which we now find within a year is being changed to prop up the failed EUro economy and the lies that were told to create it.

David Cameron and The Tories pretend to lead this Country and be the Government but they are the play pen Government of Westminster which is too guttless to do what they told everyone was against the democratic rights and interests of Britain TO GET INTO POWER.

The British Government has so little authority at Westminster that they haven't even got the courage or integrity to do what they said was right for Britain.

David Cameron if you lack the courage to do the honest and democratic things you PROMISED based on what was best for Britain and what you told people to get elected - You misled The Tory Party to get elected as leader - you misled the people to get elected to Government.

David Cameron grow up be a man and run along with your new best friend the duplicitous anti British creep Nick Clegg and get yourself both jobs in The EU - smarmy Nick Clegg the liar of student fees leader of next best to nothing - the Lib.Dims!!! can have Baroness Ashton's unelected job, Boy Dave can replace the near unknown British Commissioner & I'm sure you can find more than the required number of Damp Rags amongst the cabinet to fill the other roles whether duplicitous multi millionaire parasites completely out of touch with the people like you or not!

The British people were PROMISED a Referendum

The Conservative Party
The Lib.Dim Party
The Labour Party

HAVE without exception betrayed the peoples of BRITAIN

Give us OUR Referendum.

YOU WORK FOR US!

See also TheGagged CLICK HERE
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, 16 December 2010

RIGHTS!



FRAUD? THEFT? DISHONESTY? YOU DECIDE
INTEGRITY? COMPETENCE? PROBITY? WISDOM? VALUE FOR MONEY? 
YOU DECIDE ITS YOUR MONEY!

WE BELIEVE WE ARE ENTITLED TO HAVE A DEMOCRATIC SAY.

WE BELIEVE SELF DETERMINATION IS A FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHT.


WE BELIEVE THE STATE IS THERE AS A SERVANT OF THE PEOPLE.


WE BELIEVE WE ARE ENTITLED TO AN IN / OUT REFERENDUM.


May I draw your attention to:

The Fundamental Declaration of The Rights of Man 
Approved by: 
the National Assembly of France, August 26, 1789

Even this declaration of The Rights of Man was more sophisticated and more honourable than The Unarguably Corrupt EUropean Union.

Even The Charter of The UN states that Self Determination is a fundamental human right!

The representatives of the French people, organized as a National Assembly, believing that the ignorance, neglect, or contempt of the rights of man are the sole cause of public calamities and of the corruption of governments, have determined to set forth in a solemn declaration the natural, unalienable, and sacred rights of man, in order that this declaration, being constantly before all the members of the Social body, shall remind them continually of their rights and duties; in order that the acts of the legislative power, as well as those of the executive power, may be compared at any moment with the objects and purposes of all political institutions and may thus be more respected, and, lastly, in order that the grievances of the citizens, based hereafter upon simple and incontestable principles, shall tend to the maintenance of the constitution and redound to the happiness of all.

Therefore the National Assembly recognizes and proclaims, in the presence and under the auspices of the Supreme Being, the following rights of man and of the citizen:

Articles:

1. Men are born and remain free and equal in rights. Social distinctions may be founded only upon the general good.

2. The aim of all political association is the preservation of the natural and imprescriptible rights of man. These rights are liberty, property, security, and resistance to oppression.

3. The principle of all sovereignty resides essentially in the nation. No body nor individual may exercise any authority which does not proceed directly from the nation.

4. Liberty consists in the freedom to do everything which injures no one else; hence the exercise of the natural rights of each man has no limits except those which assure to the other members of the society the enjoyment of the same rights. These limits can only be determined by law.

5. Law can only prohibit such actions as are hurtful to society. Nothing may be prevented which is not forbidden by law, and no one may be forced to do anything not provided for by law.

6. Law is the expression of the general will. Every citizen has a right to participate personally, or through his representative, in its foundation. It must be the same for all, whether it protects or punishes. All citizens, being equal in the eyes of the law, are equally eligible to all dignities and to all public positions and occupations, according to their abilities, and without distinction except that of their virtues and talents.

7. No person shall be accused, arrested, or imprisoned except in the cases and according to the forms prescribed by law. Any one soliciting, transmitting, executing, or causing to be executed, any arbitrary order, shall be punished. But any citizen summoned or arrested in virtue of the law shall submit without delay, as resistance constitutes an offense.

8. The law shall provide for such punishments only as are strictly and obviously necessary, and no one shall suffer punishment except it be legally inflicted in virtue of a law passed and promulgated before the commission of the offense.

9. As all persons are held innocent until they shall have been declared guilty, if arrest shall be deemed indispensable, all harshness not essential to the securing of the prisoner's person shall be severely repressed by law.

10. No one shall be disquieted on account of his opinions, including his religious views, provided their manifestation does not disturb the public order established by law.

11. The free communication of ideas and opinions is one of the most precious of the rights of man. Every citizen may, accordingly, speak, write, and print with freedom, but shall be responsible for such abuses of this freedom as shall be defined by law.

12. The security of the rights of man and of the citizen requires public military forces. These forces are, therefore, established for the good of all and not for the personal advantage of those to whom they shall be intrusted.

13. A common contribution is essential for the maintenance of the public forces and for the cost of administration. This should be equitably distributed among all the citizens in proportion to their means.

14. All the citizens have a right to decide, either personally or by their representatives, as to the necessity of the public contribution; to grant this freely; to know to what uses it is put; and to fix the proportion, the mode of assessment and of collection and the duration of the taxes.

15. Society has the right to require of every public agent an account of his administration.

16. A society in which the observance of the law is not assured, nor the separation of powers defined, has no constitution at all.

17. Since property is an inviolable and sacred right, no one shall be deprived thereof except where public necessity, legally determined, shall clearly demand it, and then only on condition that the owner shall have been previously and equitably indemnified.
The EU is clearly a huge leap backwards and unarguably ultra vires to British Law, the British Constitution and even to Common Law.





my thanks for parts of the above to Yale University,  
(© 2008 Lillian Goldman Law Library
127 Wall Street, New Haven, CT 06511.)
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, 14 December 2010

Oliver ADAMS On Unemployment, The EU, Justifiable Riots & RIGHT to REFERENDUM

Oliver ADAMS On Unemployment, The EU, Justifiable Riots & RIGHT to REFERENDUM

Jon GAUNT on RT INTERVIEW 'GIVE ME £ GOOD REASONS WHY WE CAN'T HAVE A VOTE'

Jon GAUNT on RT INTERVIEW 'GIVE ME £ GOOD REASONS WHY WE CAN'T HAVE A VOTE'

Sunday, 12 December 2010

SOME of The HIDDEN COSTS of EU MEMBERSHIP - Better-Off-OUT

SOME of The HIDDEN COSTS of EU MEMBERSHIP - Better-Off-OUT
Hi,

it is contended that Britain gets back £8.9 Billion from that which we give The EU to fund them - would that be better if they gave it ALL back?

well actually NO.

The daily cost of membership is currently £48 Million and rising.

As the BCC research clearly shows the average cost per annum of the regulations alone over the last 12 years has been £5,063,833,333 or £13,873,515 a day - that is a net daily loss making these United Kingdoms ever less competitive.

Let us look at the rebate - firstly was it for projects which were of benefit to Britain that we actually wanted, may I give two small examples one being the widening of roads and strengthening of bridges to accomodate continental freight. How can this be seen as of benefit to Britain as we note the damage to the west bound carriageway of the M$ relative to the east bound as a result of the continental heavy loaded trucks heading, without stopping, to Eire (they buy no food or fuel in Britain merely paying a French company a tarriff or tax to cross the river Severn.

Consider also the destruction of many town centers by our own councils implementing unwanted, badly planned, tasteless and utterly inappropriate homogenising schemes to get some of our own money back as grants to empire build in councils Aberystwyth, Barnstable & Chepstow are classic examples!

That we are expected to advertise The EU as the generous benefactor when they give OUR money back minus their scams and bribes is a travesty - that the money is only available for THEIR approved scams and that we are forced to match fund these unwanted projects is institutionalised theft & corruption assisted by the weak & corrupt overblown, over paid and largely useless councill officials.

The more of OUR money which the EU refunds with strings attached the more The EU costs us.

To date NO ONE has EVER shown a benefit of membership that even begins to justify the moral or financial costs let alone the damage to our Country and OUR society.

How dare these odious lick spittles of The EU arrogate to themselves the right to tell us what we want!

Might the loss of spirit of the peoples of this Country give rise to the Labour fueled efforts to grow the Kleptocratic QUANGOcracy and bloat councils to generate a salary vote.

Might it be the realisation that the standards of common sense & education of the people of Britain would ensure Labour's failure at the ballott box and why they grew councils like Tower Hamlets with a strangely un-natural agenda to judge by the councillors:

Meet your councillor
All Councillors

* Councillor Helal Uddin Abbas (Labour) - Spitalfields and Banglatown
* Councillor A M Ohid Ahmed (Independent) - East India and Lansbury
* Councillor Kabir Ahmed (Labour) - Weavers
* Councillor Khales Uddin Ahmed (Labour) - Bromley by Bow
* Councillor Rajib Ahmed (Labour) - East India and Lansbury
* Councillor Rofique Uddin Ahmed (Labour) - Mile End and Globe Town
* Councillor Shelina Aktar (Independent) - Spitalfields and Banglatown
* Councillor Shahed Ali (Labour) - Whitechapel
* Councillor Timothy Archer (Conservative) - Blackwall and Cubitt Town
* Councillor Abdul Asad (Labour) - Whitechapel
* Councillor Craig Aston (Conservative) - Limehouse
* Councillor Lutfa Begum (Independent) - Limehouse
* Councillor Mizanur Rahman Chaudhury (Labour) - Bethnal Green South
* Councillor Alibor Choudhury (Independent) - Shadwell
* Councillor Zara Emily Davis (Conservative) - Millwall
* Councillor Stephanie Eaton (Liberal Democrat) - Bethnal Green North
* Councillor David John Edgar (Labour) - Limehouse
* Councillor Marc Francis (Labour) - Bow East
* Councillor Judith Anne Gardiner (Labour) - St. Dunstan's and Stepney Green
* Councillor Carlo Gibbs (Labour) - Bethnal Green North
* Councillor Peter Golds (Conservative) - Blackwall and Cubitt Town
* Councillor Shafiqul Haque (Labour) - St. Katharine's and Wapping
* Councillor Carli Harper-Penman (Labour) - Bow East
* Councillor Sirajul Islam (Labour) - Bethnal Green South
* Councillor Ann Jackson (Labour) - Bow West
* Councillor Denise Jones (Labour) - St. Katharine's and Wapping
* Councillor Emma Jones (Conservative) - St. Katharine's and Wapping
* Councillor Aminur Khan (Independent) - Whitechapel
* Councillor Anwar Khan (Labour) - Bow West
* Councillor Rabina Khan (Independent) - Shadwell
* Councillor Rania Khan (Independent) - Bromley by Bow
* Councillor Shiria Khatun (Labour) - East India and Lansbury
* Councillor Anna Siobhan Lynch (Labour) - Weavers
* Councillor Harun Miah (Respect) - Shadwell
* Councillor Maium Miah (Conservative) - Millwall
* Councillor Mohammed Abdul Mukit MBE (Labour) - Weavers
* Councillor Ahmed Omer (Labour) - Bow East
* Councillor Lesley Pavitt (Labour) - Bethnal Green South
* Councillor Joshua Peck (Labour) - Bow West
* Councillor Oliur Rahman (Independent) - St. Dunstan's and Stepney Green
* Councillor Zenith Rahman (Labour) - Bethnal Green North
* Councillor Rachael Saunders (Labour) - Mile End East
* Councillor David Snowdon (Conservative) - Millwall
* Councillor Gloria Rose Thienel (Conservative) - Blackwall and Cubitt Town
* Councillor Bill Turner (Labour) - Mile End and Globe Town
* Councillor Helal Uddin (Labour) - Bromley by Bow
* Councillor Kosru Uddin (Labour) - Mile End East
* Councillor Abdal Ullah (Labour) - St. Dunstan's and Stepney Green
* Councillor Motin Uz-Zaman (Labour) - Mile End East
* Councillor Amy Whitelock (Labour) - Mile End and Globe Town

Is this really a benefit of EU membership when one considers how relatively racially relaxed Britain was prior to EU regulations which have largely bred hatred and contempt - if not for the French, Dutch, Spaniards etc. who arrogate to make law FOR US.

We will be notably Better-Off-Out when we Leave-The-EU.

It may be some years before we are better off financially but in terms of morality, integration and self respect the gain will be immediate and as the IPPR report shows we can expect a net gain in employment and a marked upturn commercially.

Do read The Midnight Group for more facts, details and links as to how you can help.

Regards,
Greg_L-W.
Enhanced by Zemanta